SOLID STATE PRESS
← Back to catalog
The Trolley Problem and Applied Moral Dilemmas cover
Coming soon
Coming soon to Amazon
This title is in our publishing queue.
Browse available titles
Philosophy

The Trolley Problem and Applied Moral Dilemmas

A High School and College Primer on Ethics in Hard Cases

You have a philosophy essay due, an ethics unit on the syllabus, or a class discussion tomorrow — and you are not sure you can explain the difference between a utilitarian and a Kantian without your argument falling apart. This guide is built for exactly that moment.

**The Trolley Problem and Applied Moral Dilemmas** walks you through one of philosophy's most productive thought experiments from the ground up. You will meet Philippa Foot's original dilemma, the Footbridge twist that flips most people's intuitions, and a series of variants — the Loop, the Transplant case, and others — designed to isolate precisely which moral features drive your judgments. Along the way, the guide explains the two frameworks students most often need: utilitarianism (maximize overall welfare) and Kantian deontology (some actions are wrong regardless of outcomes), plus the Doctrine of Double Effect that sits between them.

The final sections move from thought experiment to real life, applying trolley-style reasoning to self-driving car algorithms, medical triage, and public health trade-offs. A practical last chapter shows you how to structure a moral argument, handle counterexamples, and avoid the mistakes that cost points on exams and essays.

This is a focused primer for high school and early-college students who need to reason through moral dilemmas clearly and quickly. If you are looking for an applied ethics study guide for college or a concise introduction before a bigger course, this is the book to read first.

Pick it up, read it in one sitting, and walk into class ready to argue.

What you'll learn
  • State the original trolley problem and its standard variants (Footbridge, Loop, Transplant) and explain what each is designed to test.
  • Apply utilitarianism, deontology, and the Doctrine of Double Effect to moral dilemmas and predict what each framework recommends.
  • Identify common student errors, such as treating 'do nothing' as morally neutral or assuming intuition equals argument.
  • Use the trolley problem as a tool to analyze real-world cases like self-driving cars, triage in medicine, and wartime decisions.
What's inside
  1. 1. The Original Dilemma: Setting Up the Trolley Problem
    Introduces Philippa Foot's original case, the standard Switch variant, and why philosophers care about a scenario that seems contrived.
  2. 2. Utilitarianism: The Math of the Greater Good
    Explains consequentialism and utilitarianism, walks through how a utilitarian solves the Switch case, and exposes where the math gets uncomfortable.
  3. 3. Deontology and the Footbridge Twist
    Introduces Kantian deontology, the Footbridge variant, and the Doctrine of Double Effect to explain why most people flip their answer between cases.
  4. 4. Variants and What They Reveal: Loop, Transplant, and Beyond
    Works through additional variants designed to isolate which moral feature is doing the work in our judgments, and shows how to use them as analytical tools.
  5. 5. From Thought Experiment to Real Life
    Applies trolley-style reasoning to self-driving cars, medical triage, wartime targeting, and public health, and shows the limits of the analogy.
  6. 6. How to Argue Well About Moral Dilemmas
    Gives students a practical toolkit for writing and discussing ethics: structuring an argument, handling counterexamples, and avoiding common mistakes.
Published by Solid State Press
The Trolley Problem and Applied Moral Dilemmas cover
TLDR STUDY GUIDES

The Trolley Problem and Applied Moral Dilemmas

A High School and College Primer on Ethics in Hard Cases
Solid State Press

Who This Book Is For

If you are a high school student working through ethics and moral dilemmas for a class, this guide is for you. The same goes for AP students who need a philosophy primer before an exam, college freshmen sitting in Introduction to Ethics, or anyone who has been handed a trolley problem and told to write a paper on it by Thursday.

This book covers the trolley problem explained for students in plain terms, then uses it to unpack utilitarianism vs. deontology explained simply, side-by-side. You will also work through key variants — the footbridge case, the loop track, the transplant surgeon — and see how applied ethics connects thought experiments to real decisions. Think of it as an applied ethics study guide for college and high school in one, about fifteen pages with no filler.

Read straight through first. Then work each example actively — pause, form your own answer, then read the solution. The final section on how to write a philosophy ethics essay and sharpen moral reasoning for beginners ties everything together.

Contents

  1. 1 The Original Dilemma: Setting Up the Trolley Problem
  2. 2 Utilitarianism: The Math of the Greater Good
  3. 3 Deontology and the Footbridge Twist
  4. 4 Variants and What They Reveal: Loop, Transplant, and Beyond
  5. 5 From Thought Experiment to Real Life
  6. 6 How to Argue Well About Moral Dilemmas
Chapter 1

The Original Dilemma: Setting Up the Trolley Problem

A runaway trolley is heading toward five people tied to the track. You are standing next to a lever. Pull it, and the trolley diverts onto a side track — where one person is tied. Do nothing, and five people die. What do you do?

That is the core of the trolley problem, one of the most analyzed thought experiments in moral philosophy. The scenario was introduced by British philosopher Philippa Foot in a 1967 paper called "The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect." Foot wasn't actually writing about trolleys — she was trying to understand why doctors feel prohibited from killing one patient to harvest organs for five, even when the math seems to favor it. The trolley case was a tool to isolate a specific moral question: is there a meaningful difference between killing someone and letting someone die?

Why Use a Thought Experiment?

A thought experiment is a carefully constructed hypothetical designed to test a moral principle by stripping away the noise of real life. In ordinary situations, moral questions come bundled with uncertainty: you don't know the outcomes, you have relationships with the people involved, there are legal consequences, and your emotions are running high. A thought experiment holds all of that constant so you can focus on one variable at a time.

The trolley is deliberately artificial. That's the point. When students object — "this would never happen" or "a real person would freeze" — they're missing the function of the exercise. The trolley problem isn't asking what would happen; it's asking what should happen, and what your answer reveals about the moral principles you actually hold.

The Switch Variant

The version most students encounter is sometimes called the Switch case, made prominent by philosopher Judith Jarvis Thomson in her 1985 paper "The Trolley Problem." The setup is exactly as described above: five people on the main track, one on the side track, a lever you can pull. Most people, when surveyed, say they would pull the lever. Five lives saved at the cost of one life lost seems like the clearly better outcome.

Notice what pulling the lever involves. You are making an active choice that redirects a lethal threat onto a specific person. That person was not in danger before you acted. Your action is the direct cause of their death.

Keep reading

You've read the first half of Chapter 1. The complete book covers 6 chapters in roughly fifteen pages — readable in one sitting.

Coming soon to Amazon